This review contains a major spoiler for Serenity. I cannot figure out how to use spoiler tags so if you haven't seen the movie, avoid paragraph 5. Apparently I am one of the few people who didn't think Serenity was the best movie ever. I keep reading rapturous reviews of it from nearly everybody and yet, my reaction (and Grant's) was "good, not great". It feels strange to be on the outside.
I can't really write this review effectively without going to see the movie again, which will not happen until the DVD becomes available. Oh yes, I will buy the DVD and I don't doubt that I will enjoy it. I may even enjoy it more the second time around, but I won't be going out to the theatre to see it.
Why didn't I love love love
Serenity? Mainly because I don't think Joss Whedon is all that good at telling his stories in a limited amount of time. He is a master at the extended arc, developing characters and plotlines with depth and nuance. This skill doesn't translate to a two-hour movie. At least, not for me.
I wanted to see this story play out over a season's worth of television. Yeah, sour grapes, but that's just how I feel. I felt cheated by the shorthand of this movie. The characters that I know and love, with the exception of River, Mal and possibly Simon, were just sidenotes to this story. And I think it hurt it.
MAJOR SPOILER AHEADFor example: How can Wash's death be anything but a clever shock for the non-Firefly fan? How can they possibly understand the depth of Zoe's loss and her willingness to die in the defense against the Reavers because she simply doesn't care if she dies? Movie-goers hardly knew them.
END SPOILERThere's lots to like about this movie. The dialogue is witty and wise. Nathan Fillion is brilliant. Summer Glau rocks my world and the plot is a good one. I just think we needed more from Joss than he gave us.
This is not a well-written review, I know. Sorry.